Dawn

Dawn

Sunday, November 04, 2018

Thoughts from Hamburg, Germany: 4.11.18

Spanish life is not always likeable but it is compellingly loveable. 
- Christopher Howse: A Pilgrim in Spain. 

If you've arrived here because of an interest in Galicia or Pontevedra, see my web page here. Garish but informative.

Matters Hamburg/German
  • I trust everyone has read the article on the difficulty of learning German. There seems to be a bit of controversy about how many forms of 'the' there are in this benighted language. Some say a mere 17 but other say 24 or more.
  • Reader María expresses sympathy for German kids. Understandably. A German friend of mine told me years ago that these poor creatures don't achieve command until they're around 12. And some of them never manage it, of course. Even in 'Low German'. In contrast, my granddaughter already out-talks her parents at 3. But, then, she is using a far simpler tool.
  • One small example . . . My host tells me that both mich and mir in these 2 sentences mean 'me' in English. Though I have a sneaking suspicion one of them could be translated (albeit literally) as 'myself'.
- Ich habe interesse an einem Beratungsgesprach zum neuen Macan oder moechte mich allgemein informieren.
- Bitte senden Sie mir weitere informationen

Query: Why is 'you'(Sie) capitalised but 'me' isn't???? Don't bother answering.

Matters Spanish
  • Here's El Pais's annual article on prostitution in Spain, where one could argue it's neither legal nor illegal. But widespread. To say the least. No one seems to have the political will to do much about the appalling trafficking of women that goes with it. 
  • The sin of a wages increase, according to the Bank of Spain
Matters USA
  • Even before I read the article below, I'd wondered how a man with Fart's much-written-about personality and temperament could ever be as happy as, say, me or you. Now I'm clear on how he gets his rocks off – by frightening himself and others on as large a scale as he can. As the author says: Fart is a one-dimensional politician. He can’t or won’t keep the nation safe against domestic terrorists whose twisted ideology he has tolerated and even endorsed. He can’t or won’t inspire the nation to optimism because he is animated by a sense of impending doom.
Matters UK
  • The State of the Nation. A columnist this morning opines that the police can't be expected to deal well with 'old' crimes if society – or at least the government – increasingly demands they deal with new crimes based on little but hurt feelings. In another paper, I read that a supermarket whose magazine included an alleged Persian recipe has been accused by some massively irate Anglo-Iranian of ‘lazy, casual racism’ because the dish was primarily Indian in nature. Ye gods. Is everyone in the UK a bloody snowflake now?
English
  • I came across the word 'woke' twice this morning. Not being up on these things, I had to check its meaning. Which is 'To be aware of and actively attentive to important facts and issues (especially issues of racial and social justice)'. We needed the word, if only to be able to use it pejoratively. I suspect Owen Jones of the Guardian is a classic case.
Finally . . .
  1. Tomorrow is Guy Fawkes Day in the UK. I was almost born on this day. Thankfully, I wasn't as my parents were planning to call me Guy if this came about.
  2. Here's a cartoon which brings a couple of today's items together. For non-Brits, it relates to the attempt by Guy Fawkes and other Catholic guys to blow up the Houses of Parliament in 1605, the so-called Gunpowder Plot:

© [David] Colin Davies, Hamburg: 4.11.18

THE ARTICLE

The only thing Trump seems to fear is running out of fear itself: Richard Wolffe

The economy is booming but it is less Morning in America, more Recurring Nightmare. Truly, this is a Fox News election

By this stage of the Trump presidency, our greatest of great leaders promised, we would be winning pretty much in every sphere of human civilization. The economy, the military, healthcare, fantasy football, the Mega Millions lottery. You name it.

In fact, he predicted that all this orgasmic winning would be so awesome that we would obviously be tired and begging him (please!) to stop with all the winning.

“You’ll say, ‘Please, please. It’s too much winning. We can’t take it any more. Mr President, it’s too much,’ he told a rally in Albany, New York, in 2016.

“And I’ll say, ‘No, it isn’t.’”

This game of fantasy politics is not just some alternate universe that occupies an alarmingly sizable proportion of the president’s very, very large brain. In his delusional nirvana of the future, Trump understands, nobody will ever be truly happy. His exhausted fans/lovers will beg him to stop, but he will deny them even that shallow pleasure.

It’s less Morning in America than our Recurring Nightmare in America. Which helps explain the curious crisis of Trump’s closing arguments in these midterm elections.

As Friday’s jobs data vividly underscored, this should be – at least economically speaking – an optimistic time in American politics. The economy is stacking up historically large numbers of new jobs, continuing a winning streak that awkwardly started under, um, Barack Obama all of 97 months ago. The unemployment rate stayed at the winningly low rate of 3.7% (a 49-year low) while wages rose 3.1% over the year.

For most politicians, this would be a frabjous day. But there are no calloohs or callays in this Trumperwocky

For most politicians, this would be a frabjous day of well-nigh full employment and fatter paychecks. But there are no calloohs or callays in this Trumperwocky.

There are just rock-wielding caravans of disease-plagued murderers invading a fragile nation at risk of imminent collapse from the enemies within: notably the media and a bunch of radical leftwing mobs in cahoots with a suspiciously Semitic man called Soros. If you haven’t already spat out your dentures, you’re not watching Fox News.

This is not a small challenge for Republicans across the country and for the Trump campaign as it looks to 2020. Much has been made of Trump’s determination to play to his base and alienate suburban voters – especially Republican women – who could, you know, decide these contests.

But Trump has an even greater limitation than his love of his own loving base. He is the candidate of crisis: not just a smash-mouth street-fighter but a peddler of the impending apocalypse.

This type of candidate gains traction after a genuine crisis, such as a once-in-a-lifetime financial collapse whose suffering lingers on for many years into the recovery. Such a candidate might live off the fumes of crisis as long as distant terrorists unsettle us.

However, it’s hard to keep a good crisis going when your voters are feeling pretty secure, at a time of relative peace and prosperity. You end up grasping at Halloween ghouls that make you look weak and out of touch. This kind of populism is only popular when things are truly scary.

What happens when 15,000 troops arrive at the Mexican border to watch an empty horizon that will not be filled with a couple of thousand unarmed civilians until next spring? How will this TV show continue without a meaningful cliffhanger? Even if George Soros flies the entire caravan to the border on a fleet of private jets, is there any suspense in seeing how the US military uses its five-to-one advantage in manpower, never mind firepower?

To use a flattering historical example, British voters famously decided that Winston Churchill was a fine wartime leader, but that the old racist rabble-rouser wasn’t exactly the national leader they wanted for peacetime. Trump may have been – for a minority of the popular vote – a better choice to shake up the system than Hillary Clinton. But the only people who want to shake up the system now are the anti-Trump resistance, and they are voting early in record numbers.

To use a less flattering European example, Italian voters decided time and again to ignore the proto-fascism of Silvio Berlusconi because he looked like he was having fun. He may have been a grotesque national embarrassment, but between his wealth and his women there were plenty of older Italian men who found him an aspirational figure.

Trump, on the other hand, rarely looks like he’s having fun. He may still appeal to older, white men. But he radiates resentment and racial fears at a time when the only people who find that aspirational are pipe-bombers and mass murderers.

So we have the weird sight of a president celebrating the good economic news by expressing his shock and fears about natural disasters.

“I will say that we had tremendous jobs numbers today,” he told reporters on Friday. “That was shocking to a number of people. That was shocking by any standard and that’s despite the hurricane.”

Trump thinks that “shocking” is a good thing. That sentiment echoed his tweetabout the jobs numbers on Friday, which expressed his surprise at the data: “Wow! The US added 250,000 Jobs in October – and this was despite the hurricanes.”

He could have said the jobs numbers were thanks to his own deficit-busting tax cuts or his environment-crushing deregulation. But no. He did tweet, two hours later, a photo of himself in a Game of Thrones design, warning darkly about sanctions against Iran. So let the good times roll!

In between tweets, he continued to stoke outrage and concoct crises by blaming the media for domestic terrorism and saying it was OK for US troops to shoot migrants who might throw rocks.

This is a parody of the terrorist-whupping presidency of George W Bush, whose own claims to national security superiority collapsed in the civil war in Iraq and the waters that flooded New Orleans. Bush was more than just a gunslinger: he aspired to Reaganesque sunshine about America’s present and future.

Trump has neither political quality; he is a one-dimensional politician. He can’t or won’t keep the nation safe against domestic terrorists whose twisted ideology he has tolerated and even endorsed. He can’t or won’t inspire the nation to optimism because he is animated by a sense of impending doom.

That crisis is real for Trump, but it isn’t coming across the border. It’s arriving next week with a Congress that will no longer shield him from investigation. And it’s probably arriving soon after that with a Mueller report that needs to claim asylum outside election season.

Never mind the fake constitutional debate about birthright citizenship. The real constitutional debate about an unlawful president is about to begin.

No comments: