Spanish
(non)Government: Given its unplanned conception, a tough pregnancy
and the much-delayed partition, you'd have to be terribly optimistic
to think a multi-party, left-of-centre coalition is going to work
well here. This is regardless of whether it emerges soon or – god
forfend - after another inconclusive election in June. But, as usual,
time will tell. Or El tiempo lo dirá.
The
Spanish Economy: Here's the FT on the current stage of
government-less progress. The opening sentence: The Spanish
economy has been a model of defiance so far this year, with a
recovery that began two years ago powering ahead despite the
country’s worst political crisis in decades. Who needs politicians?
Least of all those as corrupt as Spain's.
Spanish Wines: One of
the most expensive of these is the famous Vega Sicilia, from
Valladolid in the Ribera del Duero region. Prices range up to €3-400.
A bottle that is, not a case. I've often wondered who'd buy this but
all became clear when I read that a case of 3 is a handy gift for
local, regional or national politicians. Though I guess it's usually
more than 3 bottles in the latter 2 cases. I suspect I'll never find
out if it tastes any better than the Rioja stuff I occasionally sip.
Banking Spanish Style:
I went to my bank on Friday to tell the two charming young
ladies who deal with me that a new credit card had never arrived.
This seemed to throw both of them into a bit of confusion but they
eventually cancelled the missing card and ordered me another new one.
On Saturday, though, I had the experience – after an hour of
shopping for camino stuff – of having my debit card rejected.
Either the young ladies had cancelled both my cards or just the
functioning debit card. As I'd driven more than 60km to Santiago do
this this shopping, I was not well pleased. Even less so when,
logically, I was refused cash at an ATM and had to leave all the
items in the shop. In compensation, I went to see my Dutch friend,
Peter, just outside Santiago and sank my sorrows in a couple of
glasses of Rioja. Today I'll return to the bank, in a far less happy
state of mind than I usually do.
The Effective EU: Good
to see that a Serbian thief who'd been collared by the French police
turned out have the fingerprints of the person responsible for a
series of thefts here in 2000. Nice to know something works well. Unlike, of course, the madcap scheme to swap refugees between Greece and Turkey. To the vast benefit of Turkey. But I guess it made sense to someone.
Neighbours: I'm blessed
with excellent people on both sides of me. The lovely Ester is
particularly solicitous of my welfare. This seems to involve her
knowing exactly when I'm at home or not. True, she can see my gate
from her kitchen but she can't see me exiting through the front door
because of a large tree. So how does she know when I do this, so that
she can ask for lift down into town? Has she got a tracker on me
somewhere? That would explain a lot.
Ponters WiFi: The
download speed of this is reported to have risen tenfold in the city
over the last 6 years. As opposed to not at all over 15 years in my
pijo barrio of Poio, across the river. However, I saw some guys
working on cables a couple of weeks ago and it's now rumoured that
Telefónica are about to offer us multi megas. El tiempo lo dirá, as
they say here.
Finally . . . It seems
to me that the psychopaths who'd be quite useful during a
war turn to running large public/charity organisations in peacetime.
Take the RSPCA, for example. This is a British animal protection
organisation which non-Brits sometimes find hard to credit, as it
suggests a greater concern for animals than people. This may or may
not be a valid view but it's true that the once-treasured RSPCA has
lost a great deal of respect over the last 20 years. Here's The Times
explaining why. Essentially, like the Labour Party, it's been taken
over my extremist activists. Which is an inevitable development in
organisations which believe they have the moral high ground and that
everyone else is irredeemably evil:
Policing the Animal
Police
The Royal Society for
the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals is one of Britain’s oldest,
and until recently best loved, charities. Founded more than a century
ago to protect working animals and cherished pets from the
depravities of random abuse, it was for years among the most popular
and best funded charities in the country. That reputation has, over
the past two decades, been shredded. The RSPCA has become a shrill,
vindictive and fanatical lobby group that has veered off into areas
far from its traditional mandate: the campaign against hunting, the
support lent to animal rights groups and the flurry of private
prosecutions against farmers and individual animal owners.
The suspicion that the
RSPCA has become the captive of extremist groups pushing it into ill-
advised campaigns has been strengthened by the pronouncements of some
of its leading figures.
One member of the board
of trustees has supported exploring ways to represent animals in
parliament; another has compared farming to the Holocaust. There have
also been reports of high-handed action by RSPCA officers swooping on
pet owners accused of negligence, based largely on hearsay, who have
been taken to court. Acting almost as an unofficial police force, the
RSPCA now takes out more private prosecutions than any other
organisation in the country.
Fears that the RSPCA,
one of the few charities bearing the title “Royal”, has lost its
way were sharpened by the case of a family that was coerced into
having its cat put down, intimidated and then wrongly prosecuted. The
case, for which the society has now apologised, was such a travesty
of proper practice that it commissioned a former chief inspector to
the Crown Prosecution Service, to produce a report to help it to
learn lessons.
His report makes
devastating reading. The RSPCA hid evidence, behaved unlawfully and
provoked a hate campaign against the Byrnes family when it seized and
killed their elderly cat, Claude. The society refused to allow the
tearful family to say goodbye to the animal, and subsequently made a
number of wrong claims after the family went to the media. The
report's author says that the RSPCA made an “erroneous decision”
to prosecute, and then misleadingly claimed in a radio broadcast that
it had a 97% conviction rate.
The role of the society
in bringing prosecutions lies at the heart of the present unease over
its philosophy and outlook. Like any individual, it has a legal right
to take such action. But civil rights activists and the police
themselves are uneasy about this, largely because such cases are less
transparent than crown prosecutions and lack the oversight that comes
with the crown prosecutor.
The police have
suggested setting up a separate body to which the RSPCA could submit
evidence, which would then decide on prosecution. This would also
deal with the fact that animal cruelty is often a symptom of social
breakdown and other pathologies, which need to be dealt with by
others.
To its credit, the
RSPCA has begun to address public concern. It has let the state take
over hunting prosecutions. The new chief executive, in office for two
weeks, is likely to take a more emollient approach than his combative
predecessor. The charity has been urged to reform its way of electing
its trustees. It now needs to regain the trust of its patrons and the
animal-loving public.
My thanks to those readers who identified the weed I featured the other day.
Another repeat, for new readers of the female gender choice:
No comments:
Post a Comment